Science and trust in agriculture
Science is science, and while they do not always get it right, there remains a level of trust we should hold for the results - at least if we want to see positive steps toward the future - in this case agriculture.
April 28, 2026
Key points from this story:
- Bill C-273 allows provisional approvals
- Requires approval in two trusted jurisdictions
- Introduced by MP David Bexte
- Could speed availability of farm products
- Raises question of trusted jurisdictions
- Canada must retain final review
So it is with more than a little interest to see Bill C-273 which would allow provisional approval for products like fertilizers and pesticides if already approved in at least two trusted jurisdictions. The private members bill was introduced by Bow River, Alta. Conservative MP David Bexte. If passed the bill could make new products like feed, seed and pest control available more quickly in Canada. That, at least on its surface, makes total sense.
The question though which hangs over this is what constitutes a 'trusted' jurisdiction. Before the bulldozer efforts of US President Donald Trump to gut various programs stateside, and deregulate things in favour of big business and away from the core concept of public safety, we might have assumed the United States was 'trusted'. I doubt very much that would be particularly wise, at least without a very close second look at whatever data is offered from what appears from this side of the 49th to be a gutted US system.
So, then if we cross the hurdle as assessing trust, then it certainly opens doors for fast-tracking some advancements in key production areas such as fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides.
Canadian producers compete directly with those growing grains under similar conditions in countries such as the United States and Australia, so one hopes the playing field is as level as possible. That has to mean access to the same general package of crop inputs.
It all goes back to science creating something which reasonably should be accessible by producers worldwide - if the development research shows it is safe.
That all said, in the end you cannot hand regulatory authority to another country.
Even if the Bill passes it should be seen as a temporary pathway that allows quicker registration for use than currently exists, but still have a Canadian review which will be the determining factor in complete registration here.
If that is the structure to ultimately be developed in Canada then the Bill could be a solid step in giving farmers access to advancements in a more expedient way on par with that farmers enjoy in competing countries.
Last Mountain Times Newsletter
Join the newsletter to receive the latest updates in your inbox.